In the modern macOS ecosystem, Homebrew is a staple: the engine under the hood in software engineers' day to day development, and a productivity enhancer for macOS power users. However, its convenience and ubiquity may introduce a significant blind spot for security teams if they lack visibility into the "Cellar" - the specific location where Homebrew stores its binaries, known as formulae. Its hidden dependencies, lingering outdated binaries, and relaxed permissions can create serious security gaps. When a workstation may be the gateway to cloud and production systems, those gaps matter.
The Risk of Outdated and Pinned FormulaeHomebrew's maintenance model differs significantly from that of other software. While many applications today handle patching automatically in the background, Homebrew requires manual intervention to maintain the freshest formulae. Casual users often install a tool and never run a manual upgrade again. Even when users do upgrade, Homebrew’s default behavior is to keep older versions of a formula on the disk until a specific cleanup command is executed. While Homebrew 5.0 introduced an auto-cleanup routine that attempts to remove old versions every 30 days, a whole month is a long time for a vulnerable binary to sit on a disk in a fast-moving threat landscape. An attacker who gains access to a device during this window can scan the Cellar for these outdated versions, pointing their scripts toward the unpatched binary to bypass the security of the currently linked version. Furthermore, this recently introduced routine skips any formula a developer, intending to prevent updates that break their code, has "pinned". In that case, an attacker’s window of opportunity is potentially limitless.
Permission Changes That Weaken System Protections
Beyond the presence of outdated binaries, the very way Homebrew integrates with the operating system introduces a unique permission risk. As security researcher sainnhe explains in the article Don’t Use Homebrew (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), Homebrew changes the ownership of its installation prefix (opt/homebrew or usr/local/) to the local user. This allows users to install software without a password, but it also bypasses the protections of macOS System Integrity Protection (SIP). Because the user "owns" these files, a malicious browser extension or a compromised script can modify a Homebrew-managed tool without ever triggering a system password prompt.
Hidden Dependencies and Supply Chain Exposure
Another concern is that Homebrew formulae are rarely standalone binaries. They can pull in an entire tree of supporting libraries that are not immediately apparent to the end user. The "XZ Utils" incident of 2024 serves as a stark reminder of this: a backdoor was discovered in a low-level compression library that many users didn't even realize was on their machines because it was pulled in automatically as a dependency. Without comprehensive formulae awareness, these sub-libraries remain invisible threats sitting silently in the background.
The Developer Workstation as an Enterprise Attack Surface
There is a misconception that the "cloud" has made developers’ local machine security less relevant, but in reality, the inner loop of daily development— writing code and running local builds to check for errors—happens entirely on the workstation to avoid the latency and cost of cloud-based CI/CD pipelines. Developers use Homebrew to manage the compilers, runtimes, and local databases that make this local speed possible. Owing to the security concerns above, a vulnerable Homebrew formula could be a gateway to compromising an entire production infrastructure: Attackers may target the local environment to steal the cloud credentials, API tokens, or SSH keys stored in the user's home directory.
Conclusion
All of these concerns, coupled with the potentially devastating impact to an enterprise organization, prove that security teams must have a vulnerability management tool that can see and detect on the formulae their users’ Cellars contain. Recognition is the first step to remediation.